Guide for organizers
How to build a mobility plan for an event: a step-by-step guide
A mobility plan is the document that defines how everyone gets to, moves around and leaves your event: audience, staff, artists, suppliers and emergency vehicles. It answers three questions: how many people come, by which route and by which mode.
When there is no plan, mobility is decided by default. Each attendee chooses how to arrive with no coordination, and the organiser finds the problem on the day, when there is no room left to fix it: the car park fills up, the access points jam and the exit drags on for hours.
This guide takes you from baseline data to a complete plan in ten steps. It includes a table to choose your transport mix, a worked example for a 20,000-person festival, the indicators you should measure and the mistakes that come up most often.
Published · Updated

What is an event mobility plan and what problem does it solve?
An event mobility plan is the set of decisions, data and measures that organise how all people travel to the venue, around its surroundings and back home. It sets out how many people arrive, from where, by which mode, at what time and through which access points, and what the organiser does to keep that flow safe and manageable.
The problem it solves is improvisation. Without a plan, parking is sized by gut feeling, public transport hears about the event when queues have already formed and information reaches attendees too late. In the events sector, audience travel is also often the largest source of emissions: at UK music festivals it accounts on average for 64% of the footprint, according to The Show Must Go On report (edition 3, 2026). That figure comes from one country and one type of event, but it shows where the biggest room for improvement usually lies.
Any event that concentrates many people in a few hours needs one: festivals, concerts, matches, trade fairs, congresses, corporate events with their own venue. It is most critical at peripheral or newly built venues, where there is no established transport network to absorb the peak, and at events with late-night exits, when public transport runs fewer services.
A mobility plan does not replace event mobility management on the day, which is the operation of the event itself. The plan is what you decide beforehand; management is what you run live. If you want a checklist of the whole process, you will find the free tool at the end of the steps section.
What data do you need before you start?
Before deciding anything you need six kinds of data: capacity and peaks, audience origin, venue and access points, schedules, constraints in the surrounding area and the profile of the people who move. They do not need to be exact; they need to be written down, with their source and a reasonable margin of error.
| Data | What it is for | Where to get it |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity and presence peaks | Sizes parking, shuttles and access points. Count the people present at the same time, not only tickets sold. | Venue licence or permit, production plan, ticketing, previous editions. |
| Audience origin | Decides which areas support a shuttle (concentrated demand) and which need another solution (scattered demand). | Ticket postcodes, buyer survey, parking or coach sales data. |
| Venue and access points | Road capacity, entrance gates, space available for parking and drop-off points. | Site plan, technical visit, local council, landowner. |
| Schedules | Defines the arrival window and, above all, the exit window, which is usually shorter and more intense. | Programme, doors-open time, closing time, last public transport service. |
| Constraints in the surrounding area | Street closures, residential areas, roads with traffic limits, other events on the same day. | Local council, local police, traffic authority, local events calendar. |
| People who move besides the audience | Staff, artists, suppliers and emergency services need their own spaces and access points. | Production plan, supplier contracts, emergency plan. |
If some data does not exist yet (for example, audience origin at a first edition), write it down as an assumption and plan how to measure it. Later you will see how to estimate the modal split without data.

How do you build an event mobility plan, step by step?
The plan is built in ten linked steps: each decision depends on the previous one, so it is worth following the order even if you iterate afterwards.
Define the event
Set maximum capacity, people present at the same time, dates, opening and closing times, exact location and type of event (one day, several days, with camping, local audience or visitors). Also note who else moves: staff, artists and suppliers. Everything that follows depends on the peak number of people and on entry and exit times.
Find out where the audience comes from
Ask your ticketing provider for ticket postcodes and group them by distance from the venue: local, county, regional and from further away. You will quickly see which origins concentrate many people (shuttle candidates) and which are too scattered for a coach. If no tickets have been sold yet, use data from the previous edition or a pre-event survey.
Estimate the modal split
Assign a percentage of the audience to each mode: public transport, shuttle, car, bike or on foot, taxi or ride-hailing. Work with three scenarios (cautious, likely and favourable) and document every assumption. If you have no data of your own, the next section explains how to get it.
Calculate access points and parking
Turn the percentage arriving by car into spaces with the formula
spaces = (attendees × % by car ÷ people per car ÷ times each space is used + staff) × (1 + margin). Then check that access roads and gates can handle the arrival peak. The parking spaces calculator does the sum and compares occupancy scenarios.Design the arrival
Define recommended routes, where taxis and ride-hailing vehicles drop off, which car park each type of vehicle uses (audience, staff, accessible, carpool) and how the last stretch is signposted. Staggering arrivals eases the access points. The onboard:earth guide (2024) cites early entry and priority parking as incentives that have worked to reward full cars.
Design the exit
The exit is almost always more concentrated than the arrival, because everyone wants to leave at once. Calculate how many people leave in the critical window, how many cars and shuttle trips that means and along which roads. Plan the order in which the car park empties, a holding area for shuttles and a contingency plan in case a road is closed.
Decide which transport to contract
Contract shuttles or coaches where demand is concentrated and there is a clear stop (station, city centre, park-and-ride). Size the fleet for the exit peak, not the average, and define pick-up points, frequency and queuing. Consider ticket-plus-transport packages: the onboard:earth guide says that setting aside a percentage of tickets for these packages is an easy and decisive way to cut the number of cars.
Add carpooling
Carpooling covers the scattered demand that no shuttle makes viable. Give it an official channel, visible from the moment of ticket purchase, and a concrete incentive: priority parking or early entry for full cars, or a surcharge for cars with a single occupant. Plan a separate parking and pick-up area.
Communicate the options
According to the same onboard:earth guide, the best results come at the point of ticket purchase. Put transport options in the ticketing flow, the confirmation email, the website and a reminder in the days before. Include schedules, prices, stops and the last service back.
Measure what happened
Collect data during the event (counts, car park occupancy, clearing times) and afterwards (survey, sales data). Compare the result with the assumptions from step 3 and keep the differences. That record is the basis for the next edition and the argument for asking the local council or operators for improvements.
How do you estimate the modal split if you have no data?
The modal split is the percentage of the audience that arrives by each mode of transport, and it is estimated by combining three sources: ticket postcodes, a survey and data from previous editions. It matters because almost everything else hangs from it: with 55% by car you need far more spaces than with 30%, and that changes the land, the budget and the pressure on access points.
- Ticket postcodes. Ask your ticketing provider for the postcodes of parking tickets or of all tickets and calculate the straight-line distance to the venue with a distance calculator. The onboard:earth guide (2024) recommends exactly this method for estimating distance travelled.
- Survey. Ask how people arrived, how many were in the car, where they set off from and when they arrived and left. You can run it at the event or in a follow-up email. There is a ready-to-use mobility survey template.
- Counts and sales data. Ask volunteers to count how many people enter on foot, by bike, by train or by car in a typical hour. If you charge for parking or sell coach seats, the ticketing itself already gives you actual use.
- History and comparable events of your own. If you have previous editions of the same event, they are the best reference. If it is the first, use a similar event of your own (same venue, same type of audience) and do not copy percentages from other people's events: the split depends too much on the venue and its connections.
While you have no data, work with ranges and scenarios instead of a single figure. For car occupancy, the European Environment Agency says average car occupancy is around 1.5 people (report 19/2020). At UK greenfield festivals (2010-2014), The Show Must Go On report (2015) cites an industry average of 2.6 people per car. They are two references from different contexts and neither is a forecast for your event. Use them as the ends of your range and replace them with your own figure as soon as you have it.
Which transport mix suits your event?
There is no transport mix that works for every event: it depends on how concentrated the origin is, how well the venue connects to the public transport network and what time people leave. The table summarises when each mode fits, what it contributes, where it falls short and what you have to prepare.
| Mode | When it fits | Advantages | Limits | What to prepare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public transport (train, commuter rail, metro, scheduled bus) | Well-connected venue and an audience coming from urban areas with service. | High capacity, no contracting cost, fewer cars at the access points. | Fixed timetables and frequencies. The last service may leave before the event ends. | Coordinate extra services with the operator, communicate the last service and signpost the last stretch on foot. |
| Contracted shuttle or coach | Demand concentrated on one origin or route: station, city centre, park-and-ride. | Control of timetables and capacity. Allows ticket-plus-transport packages. | Fixed cost. Only works if it fills up and performs poorly with scattered demand. | Size for the exit peak, define stops and frequency, loading area and queue plan. |
| Carpooling | Scattered demand, towns without public transport and late-night exits. | No fleet to contract. Reduces cars and spaces. Covers routes that do not justify a shuttle. | Needs critical mass and depends on the audience using it. Does not guarantee a seat on every route. | Visible official channel at purchase, an incentive (priority parking) and a dedicated pick-up area. |
| Private car | Peripheral or rural venues and audiences travelling long distances. | Total flexibility and door-to-door travel. | Takes up space and road capacity. With low occupancy it creates many cars per person. | Sized parking, access points and signage. Consider pricing the car pass. |
| Bike and on foot | Urban venues or venues close to a town, short trips. | No emissions on the trip and no parking used. | Limited by distance, weather and safety on the way back at night. | Secure bike parking, lit and signposted routes. |
| Taxi and ride-hailing | Urban audiences, accessibility needs and late-night exits. | Door to door with no need to park. | Low capacity per vehicle. Can congest the access point at the exit peak. | Drop-off and pick-up area separate from the rest, coordination with the sector and signage. |
The modes do not compete: they are combined. The plan decides what percentage of the audience is assigned to each and what is done to make that split happen.
To compare shuttles and carpooling in detail by distance, origin and exit time, see shuttle buses or carpooling for events. For the full catalogue of options, see attendee transport for events.
Example: how to design the mobility of a 20,000-person festival
For a festival with 20,000 people present at the same time, the modal split decides the size of the car park, the shuttle fleet and the exit flow. The example below shows how the calculations chain together with hypothetical figures.
| Mode | Percentage | People | What it implies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public transport | 15% | 3,000 | Extra train and bus services must be coordinated with the operator. |
| Shuttle | 20% | 4,000 | Coaches from the station and city centre (calculation below). |
| Car (drivers and passengers) | 55% | 11,000 | 5,500 cars if average occupancy is 2.0 people per car. |
| Taxi and ride-hailing | 5% | 1,000 | Separate drop-off and pick-up area. |
| Bike and on foot | 5% | 1,000 | Bike parking and signposted routes. |
| Total | 100% | 20,000 |
| Item | Occupancy 2.0 people/car | Occupancy 2.5 people/car |
|---|---|---|
| People arriving by car (20,000 × 55%) | 11,000 | 11,000 |
| Audience cars (11,000 ÷ occupancy) | 5,500 | 4,400 |
| Plus staff, artists and suppliers | + 300 = 5,800 | + 300 = 4,700 |
| With a 10% margin (× 1.10) | 6,380 spaces | 5,170 spaces |
| Area at 25 m² per space | 159,500 m² | 129,250 m² |
Going from 2.0 to 2.5 people per car saves 1,210 spaces (19%) and 30,250 m² of land. The parking spaces calculator performs the same calculation.
| Item | Arrival | Exit |
|---|---|---|
| People on shuttles | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| Window considered | 3 hours, evenly spread | 90 minutes, with 70% of people |
| People moving in the window | 4,000 | 2,800 |
| 55-seat trips | 73 (4,000 ÷ 55 = 72.7) | 51 (2,800 ÷ 55 = 50.9) |
| Trips per hour | 24.3 | 34 |
| Coaches needed (1.5 cycles per hour) | 17 | 23 |
The exit requires more fleet than the arrival: 23 coaches against 17. Sizing for arrival leaves the exit short. The 55-seat capacity corresponds to one specific coach model (a 12.20 m Irizar i6, according to an operator's data sheet) and may vary by vehicle.
Car exit flow. With the same assumption (70% of cars leave within 90 minutes): at 2.0 people per car, 3,850 cars leave, about 2,567 per hour; at 2.5 people per car, 3,080 cars, about 2,053 per hour. Divide that figure by the real exit capacity of each road (which you must request from the local council or measure) and you will know how many exit lanes you need. With a capacity of x vehicles per hour per lane, you need 2,567 ÷ x lanes in the first scenario and 2,053 ÷ x in the second.
The lesson from the example is twofold. Raising car occupancy reduces spaces, land and exit flow at the same time. And the real bottleneck is the exit, not the arrival. To go deeper on the parking calculation, see how many parking spaces an event needs.
How do you communicate the mobility plan to attendees?
Communication decides the modal split: a plan the audience does not hear about in time changes no travel decision. The onboard:earth guide (2024) notes that the best results come at the point of ticket sale, and that coach uptake rises when the option is offered in the ticketing itself.
- What to say. The available options, the price of each, schedules, stops and pick-up points, the last service back and where to park. If parking has a price or incentives, say so in the very first message.
- When. At ticket purchase, in the confirmation email, in a reminder a few weeks before and in another in the days before, with final schedules. The last reminder must say how to leave and at what time.
- Through which channels. Ticketing, transactional email, event website, social media, newsletters and signage at the venue itself. Each channel repeats the same message in the same order of priority: collective and shared options first, private car after.
- How to make it easy. One single link with all the options, maps with the stops and a phone number or help channel. Every step you ask of the attendee reduces the number of people who use it.
- What to avoid. Putting transport information in a PDF buried on the website or publishing it a few days before the event, when the attendee has already decided how to arrive.
What should you measure and how do you turn it into improvements for the next edition?
A plan without measurement is repeated blindly; with a few minimum indicators, each edition improves on the last. Measure at the event what you can only observe then (car park occupancy, queues, clearing times) and afterwards, with a survey, what you ask the attendee (mode, occupancy, origin, reasons).
| Indicator | How it is measured | What decision it feeds |
|---|---|---|
| Actual modal split | Survey, counts and sales data, expressed as % by mode. | Adjust the assumption from step 3 and the communication. |
| People per car | Survey and counts at the car park entrances. | Size the car park and decide incentives for full cars. |
| Maximum car park occupancy | Spaces occupied at peak ÷ spaces available. | Increase or reduce area and reorganise zones. |
| Maximum queue at access points | Minutes of waiting measured in the arrival rush hour. | Stagger schedules, add gates or lanes. |
| Clearing time | Minutes from the end of the event until the last car or shuttle leaves. | Resize the exit fleet and roads. |
| Shuttle use | People per trip ÷ seats in the vehicle. | Change frequencies, routes or stops. |
| Travel kilometres and emissions | Distance by postcode × emission factor per mode. | Set reduction targets and report results. |
| Rating of the information | Scale question in the survey. | Improve content and channels. |
To calculate travel emissions, see attendee transport emissions.
Turning what you measured into improvement takes a simple routine: gather the team after the event, compare each indicator with the plan's target, note the cause of each deviation and decide one concrete action for the next edition. Keep the assumptions and the results in the same document. After two or three editions, the modal split stops being an estimate and becomes your own data.
Free toolMobility survey templateUse the mobility survey template to measure modal split, car occupancy, origin and attendee reasons.What does Spanish regulation say about event mobility?
National regulation does not require a mobility plan for every event, but it does set traffic notifications and authorisations that depend on how the road is used. The specifics also depend on the local council and the autonomous community: check with them before fixing the plan.
- Events that occupy the road. Article 12.8 of the consolidated Traffic Act (Royal Legislative Decree 6/2015), as worded by Law 9/2025, requires a minimum of ten working days' notice for recreational, tourist or traditional events without sporting competition that occupy the road in whole or in part. The recipient is the Central Traffic Authority (Jefatura Central de Tráfico) or, where applicable, the regional or local road safety authority.
- Events that do not occupy the road but generate a lot of travel. The same article also requires notification, before they begin, of events that generate abnormally high levels of travel affecting the flow and safety of roads. The text does not define what counts as abnormally high; check with the competent authority.
- Sporting events, cycling rides and other events on roads. The General Traffic Regulation (Royal Decree 1428/2003, art. 55) requires prior authorisation.
- Sustainable mobility plans under Law 9/2025. Article 25 provides for sustainable mobility plans for large activity centres identified under criteria to be set jointly by the Ministries of Transport and of Labour. The text does not mention festivals or concerts, so it cannot be said that an event is obliged.
- Self-protection plan. Royal Decree 393/2007 requires it, among others, for outdoor activities with 20,000 people or more. It deals with emergencies and evacuation, not mobility, and is prepared separately.
What are the most common mistakes when planning mobility?
The mistakes repeat edition after edition and almost all come from planning for the average instead of the peak.
- Calculating parking from total capacity instead of from the people arriving by car and the real occupancy of each vehicle.
- Setting the modal split with a single value, with no scenarios or margin of error.
- Communicating transport options a few days before the event, when the travel decision has already been made.
- Sizing shuttles for average demand instead of for the exit peak.
- Leaving carpooling to attendees' messaging groups, with no official channel and no data the organiser can see.
- Ignoring staff, artists and suppliers, who need their own spaces and access points.
- Not consulting the local council and the traffic authority until the plan is closed.
- Not measuring anything after the event, so each edition repeats the same bottlenecks.
If you already have the plan and want to reduce traffic at the access points, see reduce traffic and queues at event access.
VIB3S
VIB3S: carpooling for the last stretch of your mobility plan
If your mobility plan has an audience that comes from many different origins and does not concentrate on a shuttle route, VIB3S is the carpooling solution for events that covers that stretch. It is a shared mobility platform: a free app (iOS and Android) where attendees share a car with other people going to the same event.
For you, VIB3S sets up your event's community inside the app and a web widget that plugs into your website, your ticketing or your emails with one line of code. On the VIB3S side it is ready in under 24 hours. VIB3S complements public transport and shuttles; it does not replace them.
- Web widget: attendees see published trips, publish their own and request a seat without downloading anything.
- App: chat with the driver, profiles, trip history and ratings. The app is free and the driver shares the real costs of the trip (fuel and tolls).
- Data for the organiser: geographic origin of the audience, arrival and departure time slots, trips with the most demand, average occupancy per vehicle, shared kilometres, cars avoided and CO₂ calculated and validated on completed trips.
Sources
- Vision for Sustainable Events, The Show Must Go On, Edition 3: Quick read (2026)
- Powerful Thinking, The Show Must Go On: Environmental Impact Report and Vision for the UK Festival Industry (2015)
- onboard:earth, Green Travel & Transport Guide for Events, 4th edition (2024)
- European Environment Agency, Transport and environment report 2020: Train or plane? (2020)
- BOE, Law 9/2025 of 3 December on Sustainable Mobility (2025)
- BOE, Royal Legislative Decree 6/2015, consolidated Traffic Act, art. 12.8 (2015)
- BOE, Royal Decree 1428/2003, General Traffic Regulation, art. 55 (2003)
- BOE, Royal Decree 393/2007, Basic Self-Protection Standard (2007)
- Sanlúcar la Mayor Town Council, Municipal building ordinance regulating car parks in urban areas, art. 7.3
- ASP Group, 55-seat coach data sheet, Irizar i6 (n.d.)
Related tools
Mobility plan checklist
What a mobility plan must cover before, during and after the event, with progress tracking.
Open tool →Parking spaces calculator
Estimate how many spaces and how much area your event needs from attendance, modal split and car occupancy.
Open tool →Mobility survey template
Ready-to-copy questions to measure how your audience arrived and left.
Open tool →Keep reading
Frequently asked questions
Event types
VIB3S adapts to your type of event
The same mobility and community solution, adapted to the real problem of each sector. Pick yours to see its specific case.
Are you planning the mobility of an event?
Tell us your capacity, your venue and where your audience comes from, and we will help you see which part of your mobility plan carpooling can cover.